Unpacking the Split: Why the Demerger Matters

Unpacking the Split: Why the Demerger Matters

Tata Motors’ decision to split its business into two separate listed entities isn’t just corporate housekeeping — it could mark a turning point in how the market values its operations. The company carved out:

• A commercial vehicles (CV) arm — retaining the name Tata Motors (for simplicity I’ll call it “TMCV”).
• A passenger vehicles (PV + EV + luxury) business — newly named Tata Motors Passenger Vehicles (TMPV).

The idea: CV and PV businesses have very different dynamics — demand cycles, capital intensity, global exposure, regulatory risks — and by separating them, each gets clearer strategic focus and valuation.

The demerger became effective from 1 October 2025, with a record date for shareholders on 14 October.

---

The Q2 FY26 Snapshot: Two Very Different Stories

Let’s look at how each entity performed in their September-quarter (Q2 FY2026) results — the first since the structural change.

TMCV (Commercial Vehicles)

• Reported a net loss of ₹ 867 crore in Q2. That compares to a net profit of ₹ 498 crore in the same quarter last year.
• Revenue from operations climbed ~6 % YoY to ₹ 18,585 crore (from ~₹17,535 crore last year).
• Notably, the company has a pending acquisition of Italy’s Iveco Group NV, announced July 30 2025, expected to close April next year — which could raise its topline to ~$24-25 billion.
• Analysts say: while the CV business is facing headwinds (slower infrastructure, freight softness, competitive intensity), its operational trend is relatively stable.

TMPV (Passenger + EV + Luxury)

• Reported a massive jump in net profit: ₹ 76,170 crore in Q2, up ~2,110 % from ~₹ 3,446 crore a year ago. But a big caveat: this is mainly due to a one-time gain tied to the demerger.
• Excluding that one-time benefit, TMPV actually posted a loss of ~₹ 6,368 crore in the quarter.
• Revenue fell ~13.5 % YoY to ~₹ 72,349 crore (some slight variations in the numbers across sources). Disruption at its luxury business (Jaguar Land Rover Automotive PLC or JLR) due to a cyber incident, weaker global demand and margin pressure are weighing on performance.
• Domestically, the passenger vehicle business had some positive signs: volumes up ~11 % YoY (about 1.44 lakh units including EVs) and revenue up ~15.6 % in the Indian PV segment. But margins are slipping (EBITDA margin ~5.8 %).

---

So Which Is the Better Bet?

With both entities emerging from the same “parent”, the question for investors is: which stock offers the better risk-reward going forward? Here’s a summary of each side.

Arguments in favour of TMCV (Commercial Vehicles)

• Leaner business model now: stripped of the globally-luxury/jaguar business exposure, broader focus on domestic CV up-cycle.
• It has strong domestic market share (35 %+ in H1 FY26 according to the Mint article) in the CV space.
• The upcoming Iveco acquisition opens up global scale, engine/powertrain tech, and easier entry into new geographies. If executed well, this gives a growth runway.
• Analysts view it as the “safer” structural play: steady cash flows, lower volatility compared to TMPV. For example, according to Harshal Dasani (INVAsset PMS) — while TMPV offers high optionality, TMCV is less risky.

Arguments in favour of TMPV (Passenger + EV + Luxury)

• High optionality: It houses India’s fast-growing EV business, the luxury JLR portfolio — both of which could re-rate significantly if things go well.
• For long-term investors willing to tolerate risk, the upside potential is more with TMPV — if global luxury demand rebounds, supply chain issues at JLR ease, and EV adoption accelerates.
• Analysts suggest that once the EV business scales and JLR margin recovery begins, the valuation gap vs peers could narrow.

Key risks for each

• TMCV: Though less glamorous, it is still vulnerable to infrastructure spending slowdowns, cyclicality in freight demand, and commodity input cost pressures. Also the acquisition of Iveco brings integration risk and margin dilution.
• TMPV: The flip side of the optionality is heavy risk — weakening global demand for luxury cars, lingering cyber-incident fallouts at JLR, margin pressure, intense EV competition domestically, plus a large one-time gain that masks underlying losses. Basically, the story has to “go right” for the upside to materialise.

---

My Take: Balanced View

If I were to pick a “more probable winner” given current conditions, I would lean towards TMCV — the commercial vehicles arm. Here’s why:

• It has the more stable fundamentals right now — revenue growth (6 % YoY), domestic dominance, clear market tailwinds (GST cuts, replacement cycle in CVs).
• The demerger and listing have given it more transparency, which often helps with valuation re-rating.
• While the upside may be less explosive compared to TMPV, the probability of downside seems lower.

That said, for a higher-risk, higher-reward portfolio slot, TMPV remains very interesting — but only if you believe in a turn-around for JLR + EV scaling + domestic PV growth. If you’re investing for 3-5 years and can stomach volatility, TMPV could outperform significantly.

In short:

• Stability & moderate upside → TMCV
• Volatility & higher potential upside → TMPV

---

What Should Investors Watch Going Forward?

Here are a few actionable parameters to track:

1. Integration of Iveco for TMCV — How fast cost synergies, technology sharing, global reach pan out.
2. JLR turnaround for TMPV — Are volumes improving? Are margins recovering from the cyber incident? Their FY26 EBIT margin was cut to 0-2% from earlier 5-7% guidance.
3. Domestic PV & EV growth — For TMPV, domestic performance is a key anchor while global recovery plays out.
4. Freight/ infrastructure cycle — For TMCV, growth in logistics, infrastructure spend, fleet replacement matter.
5. Valuation multiples — Post-demerger, both firms trade at specific implied valuations. Analysts quoted estimate TMCV at ~₹300-₹470/share and TMPV ~₹400-₹420/share (depending on assumptions).
6. Tax / cost basis for shareholders — The cost of acquisition is apportioned 68.85% to TMPV and 31.15% to TMCV post demerger for taxation of earlier shares.

---

Final Thoughts

The split of Tata Motors into a focused commercial-vehicle arm and a passenger/EV/luxury arm is a significant structural event. It opens up a clearer playbook for investors. The “which is better” question doesn’t have a one-size-fits-all answer — it depends on your risk profile, investment horizon, and belief in the underlying engines (logistics/EV/luxury) playing out.

For those seeking a somewhat safer bet with reasonable upside, the commercial vehicle business (TMCV) looks more reliable right now. For those with conviction in EVs and luxury global brands, willing to ride volatility, the passenger vehicle entity (TMPV) could be where the bigger gains lie — but only if the big “ifs” resolve in its favour.

As with any stock/investment decision — especially in auto which is cyclical and technology-disruptive — it’s essential to monitor execution, market conditions, and global macro risks.